Вы здесьHow to Live : A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an AnswerFrom Starred ReviewIn a wide-ranging intellectual career, Michel de Montaigne found no knowledge so hard to acquire as the knowledge of how to live this life well. By casting her biography of the writer as 20 chapters, each focused on a different answer to the question How to live? Bakewell limns Montaigne’s ceaseless pursuit of this most elusive knowledge. Embedded in the 20 life-knowledge responses, readers will find essential facts — when and where Montaigne was born, how and whom he married, how he became mayor of Bordeaux, how he managed a public life in a time of lethal religious and political passions. But Bakewell keeps the focus on the inner evolution of the acute mind informing Montaigne’s charmingly digressive and tolerantly skeptical essays. Flexible and curious, this was a mind at home contemplating the morality of cannibals, the meaning of his own near-death experience, and the puzzlingly human behavior of animals. And though Montaigne has identified his own personality as his overarching topic, Bakewell marvels at the way Montaigne’s prose has enchanted diverse readers — Hazlitt and Sterne, Woolf and Gide — with their own reflections. Because Montaigne’s capacious mirror still captivates many, this insightful life study will win high praise from both scholars and general readers. -Bryce ChristensenReview“This charming biography shuffles incidents from Montaigne’s life and essays into twenty thematic chapters… Bakewell clearly relishes the anthropological anecdotes that enliven Montaigne’s work, but she handles equally well both his philosophical influences and the readers and interpreters who have guided the reception of the essays.” —The New Yorker “Serious, engaging, and so infectiously in love with its subject that I found myself racing to finish so I could start rereading the Essays themselves… It is hard to imagine a better introduction — or reintroduction — to Montaigne than Bakewell’s book.” —Lorin Stein, Harper’s Magazine “Ms. Bakewell’s new book, How to Live, is a biography, but in the form of a delightful conversation across the centuries.” —The New York Times “So artful is Bakewell’s account of [Montaigne] that even skeptical readers may well come to share her admiration.” —The New York Times Book Review “Extraordinary… a miracle of complex, revelatory organization, for as Bakewell moves along she provides a brilliant demonstration of the alchemy of historical viewpoint.” —Boston Globe “Well, How to Live is a superb book, original, engaging, thorough, ambitious, and wise.” —Nick Hornby, in the November/December 2010 issue of The Believer “In How to Live, an affectionate introduction to the author, Bakewell argues that, far from being a dusty old philosopher, Montaigne has never been more relevant — a 16th-century blogger, as she would have it — and so must be read, quite simply, ‘in order to live’… Bakewell is a wry and intelligent guide.” —The Daily Beast “Witty, unorthodox… How to Live is a history of ideas told entirely on the ground, never divorced from the people thinking them. It hews close to Montaigne’s own preoccupations, especially his playful uncertainty — Bakewell is a stickler for what we can’t know… How to Live is a delight…” —The Plain Dealer “This book will have new readers excited to be acquainted to Montaigne’s life and ideas, and may even stir their curiosity to read more about the ancient Greek philosophers who influenced his writing. How to Live is a great companion to Montaigne’s essays, and even a great stand-alone.” —San Francisco Book Review “A bright, genial, and generous introduction to the master’s methods.” —Kirkus Reviews “[Bakewell reveals] one of literature's enduring figures as an idiosyncratic, humane, and surprisingly modern force.” —Publisher’s Weekly (starred) “As described by Sarah Bakewell in her suavely enlightening How to Live, or A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer Montaigne is, with Walt Whitman, among the most congenial of literary giants, inclined to shrug over the inevitability of human failings and the last man to accuse anyone of self-absorption. His great subject, after all, was himself.” —Laura Miller, Salon.com “Lively and fascinating… How To Live takes its place as the most enjoyable introduction to Montaigne in the English language.” —The Times Literary Supplement “Splendidly conceived and exquisitely written… enormously absorbing.” —Sunday Times “How to Live will delight and illuminate.” —The Independent “It is ultimately [Montaigne’s] life-loving vivacity that Bakewell succeeds in communicating to her readers.” —The Observer “This subtle and surprising book manages the trick of conversing in a frank and friendly manner with its centuries-old literary giant, as with a contemporary, while helpfully placing Montaigne in a historical context. The affection of the author for her subject is palpable and infectious.” —Phillip Lopate, author of The Art of the Personal Essay “An intellectually lively treatment of a Renaissance giant and his world.” —Saturday Telegraph “Like recent books on Proust, Joyce, and Austen, How to Live skillfully plucks a life-guide from the incessant flux of Montaigne’s prose… A superb, spirited introduction to the master.” —The Guardian In a wide-ranging intellectual career, Michel de Montaigne found no knowledge so hard to acquire as the knowledge of how to live this life well. By casting her biography of the writer as 20 chapters, each focused on a different answer to the question How to live? Bakewell limns Montaigne’s ceaseless pursuit of this most elusive knowledge. Embedded in the 20 life-knowledge responses, readers will find essential facts — when and where Montaigne was born, how and whom he married, how he became mayor of Bordeaux, how he managed a public life in a time of lethal religious and political passions. But Bakewell keeps the focus on the inner evolution of the acute mind informing Montaigne’s charmingly digressive and tolerantly skeptical essays. Flexible and curious, this was a mind at home contemplating the morality of cannibals, the meaning of his own near-death experience, and the puzzlingly human behavior of animals. And though Montaigne has identified his own personality as his overarching topic, Bakewell marvels at the way Montaigne’s prose has enchanted diverse readers — Hazlitt and Sterne, Woolf and Gide — with their own reflections. Because Montaigne’s capacious mirror still captivates many, this insightful life study will win high praise from both scholars and general readers. -Bryce Christensen Named one of Library Journal’s Top Ten Best Books of 2010 In a wide-ranging intellectual career, Michel de Montaigne found no knowledge so hard to acquire as the knowledge of how to live this life well. By casting her biography of the writer as 20 chapters, each focused on a different answer to the question How to live? Bakewell limns Montaigne’s ceaseless pursuit of this most elusive knowledge. Embedded in the 20 life-knowledge responses, readers will find essential facts — when and where Montaigne was born, how and whom he married, how he became mayor of Bordeaux, how he managed a public life in a time of lethal religious and political passions. But Bakewell keeps the focus on the inner evolution of the acute mind informing Montaigne’s charmingly digressive and tolerantly skeptical essays. Flexible and curious, this was a mind at home contemplating the morality of cannibals, the meaning of his own near-death experience, and the puzzlingly human behavior of animals. And though Montaigne has identified his own personality as his overarching topic, Bakewell marvels at the way Montaigne’s prose has enchanted diverse readers — Hazlitt and Sterne, Woolf and Gide — with their own reflections. Because Montaigne’s capacious mirror still captivates many, this insightful life study will win high praise from both scholars and general readers. —Bryce Christensen Named one of Library Journal’s Top Ten Best Books of 2010
|
Вход на сайтПоиск по блогам и форумамUser menuПоследние комментарии
Океана RE:Подайте бедному копеечку на книжку с литреса... 1 день
sem14 RE:Серия "Я познаю мир" издательства "АСТ, Астрель, Олимп",... 1 неделя sem14 RE:Книжная серия "Жизнь в искусстве" издательство "Искусство"... 2 недели sibkron RE:"100 славянских романов", серия изд.-ва "Центр книги... 2 недели larin RE:Пропал абонемент 1 месяц Larisa_F RE:Серия "Новые сказочные повести" издательство "Самовар" ... 1 месяц sem14 RE:Серия "Символы времени" издательства "Аграф" 1 месяц Larisa_F RE:Серия книг «Судьбы книг» издательства «Книга» 1 месяц tvv RE:faq brainstorm =) 1 месяц Larisa_F RE:Серия "Что есть что" издательства "Слово"(чего не хватает) 1 месяц Larisa_F RE:Серия "Очень прикольная книга", издательство Азбука-классика 1 неделя larin RE:абонемент не обновлен 1 месяц sem14 RE:За иллюминатором (серия) - чего не хватает? 2 месяца sem14 RE:Собираем серию: "Мастер серия", издательство "Лимбус". 2 месяца Larisa_F RE:Книжная серия «Сlio» издательства "Евразия" 2 месяца tvv RE:DNS 2 месяца MrMansur RE:<НРЗБ> 2 месяца Stager RE:Беженцы с Флибусты 2 месяца Впечатления о книгах
valeryma про Земляной: Мастер стихий [СИ] (Альтернативная история, Социальная фантастика, Попаданцы, Самиздат, сетевая литература)
15 03 Графомань для подростков в пубертате Оценка: нечитаемо
Darja68 про Маринина: Посох двуликого Януса (Детективы: прочее)
14 03 Господи, какая немыслимая чушь. Это ж надо так. (( Стерла из читалки. А какой была хорошей детективщицей!
udrees про Володин: Газлайтер. Том 10 [СИ] (Альтернативная история, Боевая фантастика, Фэнтези, Попаданцы, Самиздат, сетевая литература)
14 03 Достаточно рядовое продолжение серии, читается увлекательно, если не обращать внимания на примитивные описания и несерьезные разговоры. Школа у героя закончилась, но школа в его голове осталась. Сам он так же крут, всех врагов ………
udrees про Володин: Газлайтер. Том 9 [СИ] (Альтернативная история, Боевая фантастика, Фэнтези, Попаданцы, Самиздат, сетевая литература)
14 03 Для любителей серии и кого устраивают такие «взрослые сказки». Главный герой все так же крут, что спокойно побеждает даже своих учителей в Академии. Ну и кстати наконец-то заканчивает свою школу. Проблемную тему с любовным ……… Оценка: неплохо
udrees про Вальтер: Браконьер 2 (Боевая фантастика, Приключения: прочее, Постапокалипсис, Самиздат, сетевая литература)
14 03 Автору понравилась своя вселенная про вампиров, что параллельная история приключений еще одного героя тоже не стала лишней. В принципе сюжет 1 и 2 книг похожи на сюжет из аналогичной серии Морзе. Герой все такой же быстро ……… Оценка: хорошо
Олег Макаров. про Повар
14 03 Отлично же. Какой-то Макс Фрай прямо даже местами. И написано хорошо, и герои объёмные, и авторы почти не переигрывают
Stager про Валин: Развод по-шпионски (Героическая фантастика, Фэнтези)
13 03 Я наконец понял, что меня раздражает в последних книгах автора. В самом начале в произведениях были как бы положительные герои. Ну, умные, добрые, честные... В конце - всё по культурному, по-европейски: все одинаковое ……… Оценка: неплохо
Олег Макаров. про Бывает и хуже?
12 03 Как будто дубль книги “Двадцать два несчастья” авторов Д.Сугралинов, А. Фонд Ну прямо очень похоже, и написано так же неуклюже. И ту я тоже не дочитал, бросил
Sello про Кавабата: Тысячекрылый журавль (Современная проза)
11 03 Очень многоплановое произведение, в котором, как это свойственно вообще японской литературе, через пунктирное вырисовывание характеров героев, противопоставляются красота и уродство, красота живая, полная переживаний (Оота ……… Оценка: отлично!
nik_ol про Донцова: Зеркало бедного зайца (Иронический детектив, Детективы: прочее)
11 03 Да когда же вы новое выложите уже, а, ребятки?... Оценка: хорошо
Oleg68 про Зоран Чирич
11 03 Книга сильно изобилует ненормативной лексикой. если ее убрать , то получится неплохая криминальная драма
Isais про Голотвина: Домашний учитель для чудовища [СИ] (Боевая фантастика, Социальная фантастика, Самиздат, сетевая литература)
08 03 «Домашний учитель для чудовища» — то же, что и «Педагогическая баллада» этих же авторов, сюжет и фабула совпадают. Но за счет добавления деталей, их переакцентировки, более прописанного социального фона именно этот вариант ……… Оценка: хорошо |